Ulf M�ller wrote:
>
> > Which is why the dependencies _should_ be included in CVS.
>
> OK.
>
> > Why do you need to do a make depend anyway when algorithms are disabled?
>
> So you can actually remove ciphers you have no license for from source code
> distributions.
>
> I do hope that make depend fails graciously on those systems you mentioned.
> Otherwise that is what needs to be fixed.
I have no idea: my last SCO system died about a month ago, and I have no
intention of reviving it (well, not as a SCO system, anyway).
I don't get it, though. If it is acceptable for it to fail gracefully,
why do we need to run it at all?
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
