Bodo Moeller wrote:
>
> "Ralf S. Engelschall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Yes, Ben is right: At the release level people can use OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER
> > and that should be enough. When we start at the development level to increase
> > a number for every API change we get the same chaos as for Apache: it's often
> > forgotten, people complain about two much such numbers to check for, etc. pp.
>
> We *could* add a file with an extra #define that is automatically set
> to the current date each time a snapshot is tar'ed -- e.g.
>
> #define OPENSSL_VERSION_DATE 0x19990518
Yes, I'd have zero objection to that!
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
