>So should all occurrences of SHA_ASM just be changed to SHA1_ASM for
>consistency (or, for even more consistency, all occurrences of
>SHA1_ASM to SHA_ASM)?

I vote for more consistency. :)
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to