Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
>
> From: Ben Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ben> Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote:
> ben> > We could do domething like
> ben> >
> ben> > #define PEM_read_PrivateKey(fp,pkeyp,callback)\
> ben> > PEM_read_PrivateKey_ex(fp,pkeyp,callback,NULL)
> ben> >
> ben> > Would be no overkill, cause we still have only one set of functions
> ben>
> ben> Oh yes. That's sensible.
>
> I know that we don't care much about API changes in 0.9.x. However, I
> hope changes like that won't happen when you do care. The reason is
> that it would break linkage to older versions of shareable libraries
> (DLL's, shareable images, whatever you wanna call it). Whenever we
> start to care about such things, PEM_read_PrivateKey would have to be
> a wrapper function, not a macro.
Of course.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
