I'm not sure I understand the use or purpose of CRYPTO_malloc_locked()
and friends. Is it meant to be used for some kind of special locking,
other than the locking that correctly implemented OS's have in their
allocation routines?
As far as I can see, CRYPTO_malloc_locked and friends are only used in
crypto/rsa/rsa_lib.c (masqueraded as Malloc_locked() and Free_locked()).
If it's supposed to be used for extra locking, wouldn't reimplementing
them to use the OpenSSL locking routines be a good thing?
The reason I'm asking is that I want to put some debugging code around
the actual call to malloc_locked_func(), and it feels that code should
be inside the lock as well...
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-161 43 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
crypto/mem.c(CRYPTO_malloc_locked()) question
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker Thu, 16 Dec 1999 06:14:29 -0800
- Re: crypto/mem.c(CRYPTO_malloc_locked()) que... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: crypto/mem.c(CRYPTO_malloc_locked()... Dr Stephen Henson
- Re: crypto/mem.c(CRYPTO_malloc_lock... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
