> WHy woudl you transform it to C++.  It adds about 50K to the 
> executable on linux GCC and runs slower.  I can't see much reason 
> to use C++ for a library liek OpenSSL

Your statement is not generally applicable! A C++ binary may be
a bit larger than a C++ binary. Wheter it runs slower depends
on the design. A proper OO design in C++ is (in general) faster
and more stable than a C hack without a design.

Regards Rene

--
-----------------------------------------------------------
Rene G. Eberhard
Mail  : [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to