From: Kevin Steves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> stevesk> http://people.hp.se/stevesk/patch/sha_md5.patch stevesk> stevesk> is a patch to speedup MD5 and SHA1 on LP64 platforms by using stevesk> ints instead of long. There are some comments in the patch stevesk> that explain the reasoning behind this, and Chris can provide stevesk> more information if needed. Downloaded as well. However, I'm wondering about some of the changes and what they will do to some compilers and/or operating systems. Especially removing U from constants that are supposed to be unsigned... -- Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chairman@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 Redakteur@Stacken \ SWEDEN \ or +46-709-50 36 10 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: int vs. long and LP64 in MD5 and SHA
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker Wed, 17 May 2000 14:47:41 -0700
- int vs. long and LP64 in MD5 and SHA Kevin Steves
- RE: int vs. long and LP64 in MD5 and SH... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- RE: int vs. long and LP64 in MD5 and SH... Chris Ruemmler
