I'm really sorry bothering you again, but I realized that my previous patch was a bit clumsy. Mostly because it wasn't consistent with the way "openssl x509" and "openssl crl" prints the DN hash value, so it didn't fit too well into the convention of making symlink names based on the hash (I have now removed the leading "hash="). So I'm sending a new patch (this time against SNAP-20000623), that I hope will be more useful. Regards, SSS
- Subject DN and hash output from openssl req Svenning S�rensen
- RE: Subject DN and hash output from openssl req Svenning S�rensen
- Svenning S�rensen
req.c.diff