I'm really sorry bothering you again, but I realized that my previous
patch was a bit clumsy. Mostly because it wasn't consistent with the
way "openssl x509" and "openssl crl" prints the DN hash value, so it
didn't fit too well into the convention of making symlink names based
on the hash (I have now removed the leading "hash=").
So I'm sending a new patch (this time against SNAP-20000623), that I
hope will be more useful.

Regards,
SSS

req.c.diff

Reply via email to