From: Bill Rebey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Bill.Rebey> I'm getting a failed assertion ("thank you" to the
Bill.Rebey> programmer who was wise enough to put the way-underused
Bill.Rebey> assertion statement in his code) on Windows NT:
Bill.Rebey> 
Bill.Rebey> md_rand.c, line #353 asserts that md_c[1] == md_count[1]
Bill.Rebey> 
Bill.Rebey> Any ideas why it's failing?

I've an idea: if you look at that line, you'll see that it's
surrounded with a '#ifndef THREADS .. #endif'.  If you get that
assertion abort, it means that your OpenSSL is not copmiled to support
threading.  According to what I can see in Configure, this will
definitely happen when you configure for VC-WIN16, VC-W31-16,
VC-MSDOS or BC-16.  How exactly did you configure and build?  And
exactly which library do you link against?

Bill.Rebey> Also, has anyone gotten anywhere on the lh_retrieve() crash bug?

I haven't, and I have some trouble finding your mail about it (mew has
done something terribly wrong, I suspect).

Bill.Rebey> How 'bout the SSL_CTX_set_tmp_dh hanging bug?

Same answer there.

Bill.Rebey> Has anyone gotten around to fixing the "build without RSA
Bill.Rebey> problems".

Well, I tried that on Solaris, and had no problem at all.  I'm not
sure if you said what platform you used to test.

-- 
Richard Levitte   \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chairman@Stacken   \ S-168 35  BROMMA  \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
Redakteur@Stacken   \      SWEDEN       \ or +46-709-50 36 10
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis                -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/

Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to