From: Jeffrey Altman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> jaltman> > Rand_Poll succeeds in the sense that the function completes, jaltman> > but it never returns to ssleay_rand_bytes. jaltman> jaltman> What do you mean by "but it never returns to ssleay_rand_bytes"? How jaltman> can it return to RAND_bytes() without returning to jaltman> ssleay_rand_bytes()? Hmm, could that be an effect of some kind of optimization? Just a wild theory... -- Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chairman@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 Redakteur@Stacken \ SWEDEN \ or +46-709-50 36 10 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: win32 tests and RAND_poll weirdness
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker Fri, 15 Sep 2000 02:41:48 -0700
- win32 tests and RAND_poll weirdness Andrew W. Gray
- Re: win32 tests and RAND_poll weirdness Jeffrey Altman
- Re: win32 tests and RAND_poll weird... Ulf Moeller
- Re: win32 tests and RAND_poll weird... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: win32 tests and RAND_poll w... Andrew W. Gray
- Re: win32 tests and RAND_poll weirdness Jeffrey Altman
- Re: win32 tests and RAND_poll weird... Andrew W. Gray
- Re: win32 tests and RAND_poll w... Andrew W. Gray
- Re: win32 tests and RAND_poll weirdness Jeffrey Altman
- Re: win32 tests and RAND_poll weirdness Jeffrey Altman
- Re: win32 tests and RAND_poll weirdness Jeffrey Altman
- Re: win32 tests and RAND_poll weirdness Jeffrey Altman
