>If I'm understanding correctly, he's saying that "standard" is >subordinate to "iso", so, effectively, you have to defined something >like "iso/standard" or "iso.standard" in a flat namespace. That is, >there could be a _different_ "standard" under, say, "ietf" Exactly. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Object identifiers and ASN.1 syntax Rich Salz
- Re: Object identifiers and ASN.1 syntax Dr S N Henson
- Re: Object identifiers and ASN.1 syntax Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: Object identifiers and ASN.1 syntax Ben Laurie
- Re: Object identifiers and ASN.1 syntax Ben Laurie
- Re: Object identifiers and ASN.1 syntax Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: Object identifiers and ASN.1 syntax Ben Laurie
- Re: Object identifiers and ASN.1 syntax Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: Object identifiers and ASN.1 syntax Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: Object identifiers and ASN.1 syntax Kevin Blanchard
- Re: Object identifiers and ASN.1 syntax rsalz
- Re: Object identifiers and ASN.1 syntax rsalz
