From: Rich Salz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Problem with > 1024 file descriptors Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:48:44 -0500 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> rsalz> > ???? The above line strikes me as a typical fence-post error on the rsalz> > part of the application author. rsalz> rsalz> No. Some Solaris, for example, use a char (not even unsigned char!) to rsalz> store the file descriptor in their FILE structure (E.g., what K&T (1st rsalz> ed.) shows as "int _fd" on page 165. Granted. But it doesn't make the code you showed less a fence-post error :-). rsalz> I am skeptical, but can believe that fopen/et al are more portable than rsalz> open/read et al. Which is why I suggested making it a compile-time flag rsalz> in bss_file.c Note, that's mostly for streams, and moreso for streams of text. At least in my area of experience... rsalz> > Also, have you looked at bio/bss_fd.c? rsalz> rsalz> Sure, but the issue is what OpenSSL uses interally, as I hope rsalz> my example showed. Oh, absolutely. What I wanted to point out is that there is a BIO that uses file descriptors, which makes the need for a flag to bss_file.c completely needless and one complication too many. To solve said problem, one should use the file descriptor BIO instead of the stream BIO... -- Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chairman@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 Redakteur@Stacken \ SWEDEN \ or +46-709-50 36 10 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with > 1024 file descriptors
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:33:04 -0800
- Re: Problem with > 1024 file descriptors Geoff Thorpe
- RE: Problem with > 1024 file descrip... David Schwartz
- Re: Problem with > 1024 file descriptors Dan Kegel
- RE: Problem with > 1024 file descrip... David Schwartz
- Re: Problem with > 1024 file descriptors Dr S N Henson
- Re: Problem with > 1024 file descriptors Matti Aarnio
- Re: Problem with > 1024 file descrip... Dan Kegel
- Re: Problem with > 1024 file descriptors Rich Salz
- Re: Problem with > 1024 file descriptors Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: Problem with > 1024 file descriptors Rich Salz
- Re: Problem with > 1024 file descriptors Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: Problem with > 1024 file descrip... Rich Salz
- Re: Problem with > 1024 file descriptors Dr S N Henson
- Re: Problem with > 1024 file descriptors Rich Salz
- Re: Problem with > 1024 file descrip... Dan Kegel