Re: Attempt at constification generates questions...

[Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker]

From: Ben Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

ben> Woah! Let's not get carried away - unless they gain is actually zero,
ben> then constification is not justification, in itself, for doing this.
ben> Note, you could have a constified version that either didn't do
ben> BN_RECURSION or copied instead of expanding.

That's what I ended up doing (actually, what was needed was a copying
version of bn_expand2).  I'm a little unsure about my solution, still,
so I'll ponder it for a couple of days before I commit.

-- 
Richard Levitte   \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chairman@Stacken   \ S-168 35  BROMMA  \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
Redakteur@Stacken   \      SWEDEN       \ or +46-709-50 36 10
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis                -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/

Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]