From: Dr S N Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

drh> Ulf M�ller wrote:
drh> > 
drh> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 02:33:29AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
drh> > 
drh> > >   directly between an ASN1 INTEGER and a BIGNUM. CBIGNUM clears the
drh> > >   BIGNUM when it is freed (for sensitive information).
drh> > 
drh> > Shouldn't that rather be an attribute of BIGNUM?
drh> 
drh> Well its just what the thing is called at the new ASN1 level. Its
drh> referenced by an ASN1_ITEM structure called CBIGNUM_it. It all uses
drh> BIGNUM structures and just that CBIGNUM_it has a flag set in its
drh> structure that automatically ends up clearing it out when it is freed.
drh> 
drh> Or did you mean something else?

I think Ulf means that the flag in CBIGNUM_it should really be part of
BIGNUM instead.  I do agree about that, and since there's already a
flags member in BIGNUM, it's not hard at all to impement...

-- 
Richard Levitte   \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chairman@Stacken   \ S-168 35  BROMMA  \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
Redakteur@Stacken   \      SWEDEN       \ or +46-709-50 36 10
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis                -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/

Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to