From: "Dror" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
drorotmi> _NORMAL_BLOCK = 1 and _CLIENT_BLOCK = 4 are the
drorotmi> options.
drorotmi>
drorotmi> Question: If you do it this way, why don't you add the block type
drorotmi> also as an argument instead of a define?
And do what with it? It would become some kind of OpenSSLish value
that would remain constantly the same anyway, so it might as well be
provided properly by your callback. There's no differenciation
between the different allocations that are done from within OpenSSL,
so it would be meaningless, at least upto now.
Warning, the functions and methods I defined today may change in the
future.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chairman@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
Redakteur@Stacken \ SWEDEN \ or +46-709-50 36 10
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
