From: Dr S N Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drh> That got bitten by some responders which set thisUpdate and drh> nextUpdate to exactly the same time. I'm not gonna look if that is allowed by the RFC. The paranoid would probably reject such a response, since it's basically invalidating itself immediately (presuming that when you've gone past nextUpdate, the response you have is not valid any more, and you should go get another one). [rant: a well-written RFC should not leave so many things open for interpretation. That's why I think RFC 2560 is badly written] drh> Instead I've gone for checking whether thisUpdate <= nextUpdate drh> and that they occur within a configurable interval of the current drh> time. Hmm, I was under the impression that any verification involving time basically requires that the computer has actual correct time. Therefore "within a configurable interval" is a moot point. But if you get responses where thisUpdate == nextUpdate, I can understand this. Personally, I think such responses should be rejected. drh> I was going to add an additional parameter that specifies the drh> maximum age of thisUpdate if nextUpdate is absent. That's a good idea. -- Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chairman@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 Redakteur@Stacken \ SWEDEN \ or +46-709-50 36 10 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OCSP nonce was: RE: cvs commit:openssl/ssls3_lib.cssl.hssl_algs.cssl_ciph.cssl_locl.h tls1.h
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker Thu, 08 Feb 2001 23:58:17 -0800
- Re: OCSP nonce was: RE: cvs commit: openssl/... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- RE: OCSP nonce was: RE: cvs commit: ope... Florian Oelmaier
- Re: OCSP nonce was: RE: cvs commit: ope... Dr S N Henson
- RE: OCSP nonce was: RE: cvs commit:... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- RE: OCSP nonce was: RE: cvs commit: ope... Peter Gutmann
- Re: OCSP nonce was: RE: cvs commit: ope... Peter Gutmann
