From: Lutz Jaenicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lutz.Jaenicke> It is correct in the sense that using the same name
Lutz.Jaenicke> (0.9.6) for different versions, that are not binary
Lutz.Jaenicke> compatible, does not make sense. We'll have to keep
Lutz.Jaenicke> this in mind for the 0.9.7 and later versions.
The 0.9.6 series have few enough changes to be compatible, actually,
so calling those shared libraries 0.9.6 makes sense. You're
absolutely right that this has to be changed for 0.9.7. Actually, if
you look at the end of crypto/opensslv.h in the main trunk, you'll see
that it has already been arranged.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-733-72 88 11
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Software Engineer, GemPlus: http://www.gemplus.com/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
