> Anyway. That has not been the initial question. Is there anything > wrong with the three different implementations of the mul procedure ? > I think that's more important. Since (as you might have seen) mul1 and mul2 > do generate different results due to the fact that the idae_mul1 macro > doesn't do the '(a-b) + (a<b)' stuff.
Please provide example inputs where the results differ. A single a, b pair is enough. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
