John Cebasek wrote: > > Hi All; Hello John, > I need some comments. > > We've been creating some 'black boxes' for other developers in our company > to work with. One of the black boxes is opensll. We want to distribute to > our developers just 'enough'. So they'll be getting the libraries, but what > do I have to give them in the way of includes. Should the developers just > get the include/openssl directory or can I trim that down more.
Why would you do that ? You can't hide any information about OpenSSL that way. If your developer want to see the full list of headers, they can get them from www.openssl.org. (besides the sources...) And figuring out which header they need costs time you really should spent on doing something usefull. Bye Goetz -- Goetz Babin-Ebell, TC TrustCenter AG, http://www.trustcenter.de Sonninstr. 24-28, 20097 Hamburg, Germany Tel.: +49-(0)40 80 80 26 -0, Fax: +49-(0)40 80 80 26 -126
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
