I've looked at the two patches you sent (relative to 0.9.6d and
0.9.7). Unfortunately, I believe that the 0.9.6d won't get applied,
because of unpredictable problems that might occur. Therefore, I will
only comment that 0.9.7 one.
I understand the reasons behind several things you do, like the
symlink hackery. However, I can't help but wonder why you do that at
all in Configure when util/mklink.pl already deals with the situation,
and would therefore properly take care of it when 'make links' is run.
Does system() not work in perl under DOS? It seems like you want to
avoid using system() as much as you can. If not, then why the hackery
of util/mklinks.pl?
Now, in certain test scripts, you have added lines that very much
remind me of C preprocessor lines. Care to explain that, and
especially how you see them getting processed as you intended? And
just so we're clear on this, I am not willing to patch sh scripts with
some cpp hackery like that. Been there, done that, don't wanna do it
again.
Other than that, I've no problems with your patches. But since the
things mentioned above are the bulk of it, I think I'll wait for your
answers :-).
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
