On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 10:33:10AM +0200, Michael Bell wrote: > Lutz Jaenicke schrieb: > > > > On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 08:07:43PM +0100, Dr S N Henson wrote: > > > However a new FAQ entry might be in order or possibly changing the > > > default display options so that the old behaviour is no longer the > > > default and adding a "-nameopt old" option is explicitly needed instead. > > > > -nameopt compat shall retain compatibility. > > Hmm, make "oneline" the new default? Or rather leave it "as is" and just > > add it to the FAQ. Robert Joop and Michael Bell, active in discussing > > DN issues, are with the OpenCA project. It should be possible for them > > to catch the problem by using an appropriate command line flag when > > calling "openssl x509". > > I think the FAQ entry is enough. If you set a new default then you can > surprise many small scripts and their users. The flag -nameopt is a good > solution.
I have added the entry. > The only problem for the future is the support of this flag in all the > other tools (especially ca and req have problems with their option > -subj). Robert Joop sent a patch last week (not applied, yet). Does it solve the problems you mention? Best regards, Lutz -- Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/ BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]