On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 10:33:10AM +0200, Michael Bell wrote:
> Lutz Jaenicke schrieb:
> > 
> > On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 08:07:43PM +0100, Dr S N Henson wrote:
> > > However a new FAQ entry might be in order or possibly changing the
> > > default display options so that the old behaviour is no longer the
> > > default and adding a "-nameopt old" option is explicitly needed instead.
> > 
> > -nameopt compat shall retain compatibility.
> > Hmm, make "oneline" the new default? Or rather leave it "as is" and just
> > add it to the FAQ. Robert Joop and Michael Bell, active in discussing
> > DN issues, are with the OpenCA project. It should be possible for them
> > to catch the problem by using an appropriate command line flag when
> > calling "openssl x509".
> 
> I think the FAQ entry is enough. If you set a new default then you can
> surprise many small scripts and their users. The flag -nameopt is a good
> solution.

I have added the entry.

> The only problem for the future is the support of this flag in all the
> other tools (especially ca and req have problems with their option
> -subj).

Robert Joop sent a patch last week (not applied, yet). Does it solve the
problems you mention?

Best regards,
        Lutz
-- 
Lutz Jaenicke                             [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik
Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to