Is there any chance that somone will comment on this topic anytime soon ? PT> Does the attached oneliner make sense ? IMO it doesnt break anything, PT> but allows reusing the EVP_CIPHER_CTX in calls to EVP_EncryptUpdate, PT> after EVP_EncryptFinal is called.
PT> Any comments greatly appreciated :) PT> The diff is against the released 0.9.6c version of the OpenSSL PT> library. PT>> Currently EVP_Encrypt* interface doesnt support PT>> encryption of multiple data streams with a single PT>> symmetric key. Is there any chance patches to PT>> allow this to be accepted in the official OpenSSL PT>> codebase ? Currently I'm thinking to modify EVP_EncryptFinal PT>> so it leaves the EVP_CIPHER_STATE in a consistent state PT>> after finishing its work. PT>> Any comments on this ? I am aware of the fact that encrypting PT>> multiple data streams with a single key is not such a good idea PT>> of a security point of view. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
