"Steven Bade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm not sure about the second question, but we found that the eracom > engine submission was much more generic. When one of my co-workers > tried to get our PKCS#11 libraries (openCryptoki) used by the Trustway > module there were many issues, as well as specific calls directly to > PKCs#11 functions rather than through the function list. If I remember > correctly the Eracom submission from last year was much more generic and > we had to do nothing except point it to our shared library... No > requirements for GKPCS11 headers, no direct function calls... >
I think that in the case of Eracom card, keys are generated by an external way. Trustway card generates and stores keys, it's the reason of changes in the RSA methods. If needed, I can add the include files in the patch, so it doesn't require to get gpkcs11 headers. afchine ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
