On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 09:01:53AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Log: > The correct PERL interpreter is passed via commandline.
> RCS file: /e/openssl/cvs/openssl/apps/Makefile.ssl,v > retrieving revision 1.100.2.2 > retrieving revision 1.100.2.3 > diff -u -r1.100.2.2 -r1.100.2.3 > --- Makefile.ssl 2002/04/06 19:14:48 1.100.2.2 > +++ Makefile.ssl 2002/06/05 07:01:13 1.100.2.3 > @@ -14,7 +14,6 @@ > MAKEDEPPROG= makedepend > MAKEDEPEND= $(TOP)/util/domd $(TOP) -MD $(MAKEDEPPROG) > MAKEFILE= Makefile.ssl > -PERL= perl > RM= rm -f > # KRB5 stuff > KRB5_INCLUDES= Is there a particular reason for deleting these definitions? The value passed on the command line will override the value found in the Makefile anyway, so there should be no harm in keeping the PERL=... line. The reason for providing a PERL definition in the Makefile, even though it will be ignored under usual circumstances, is that otherwise very strange things might happen if make is run without a PERL definition on the command line. We could use 'PERL=false' to ensure that make will fail in a predictable way in such cases. -- Bodo M�ller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP http://www.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de/TI/Mitarbeiter/moeller/0x36d2c658.html * TU Darmstadt, Theoretische Informatik, Alexanderstr. 10, D-64283 Darmstadt * Tel. +49-6151-16-6628, Fax +49-6151-16-6036 ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
