Thus spake Ben Laurie: > Satria Bakti (13297096) wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm doing some experiment on openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20020421. > > I replaced the AES code (the original AES code) with > > Brian Gladman's AES code (with some modification). > > (http://fp.gladman.plus.com/cryptography_technology/rijndael/)
Can you send us the modifications you used? > > There are significant increases. I'm afraid that there is something > > wrong with my implementation. How could the speed increase so > > significant ? > > > > Any comments or explanations are welcome. > > Its possible, in fact - because what we have is the reference code, and > Gladman's is optimised for speed. Of course, if the code passes the > tests, then you must, presumably, have got it right. I haven't committed the AES test code yet, so we don't know if either implementation is actually correct. > Are you planning to contribute your implementation (I'd been planning to > look at this at some point myself). I'd have done it myself if I'd known Gladman's implementation was *that* much faster. I've been spending my cycles trying to make the various modes go faster, which should help most/all of the ciphers. S -- Stephen Sprunk "So long as they don't get violent, I want to CCIE #3723 let everyone say what they wish, for I myself have K5SSS always said exactly what pleased me." --Albert Einstein ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
