----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Levitte via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: den 27 juni 2002 17:17 Subject: [openssl.org #111] Cross compilation assumption
> > [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jun 27 15:49:46 2002]: > > > Yes, I did notice that after sending, so it's not that big a deal > as I > > first thought. I can see two solutions: > > > > - Add another field to Configure > > Yes, that could be a possibility. Another is to call make like this: > > make AR=foo > > Also, you haven't answered the implied question: what platform is it > that needs something different than 'ar', and what is the name of > that alternate command? When crosscompiling for the CRIS architecture (in ETRAX chips from Axis Communciations, Sweden) the tools are: gcc-cris, ranlib-cris and ar-cris (or cris-xx) (possibly some extra arguments as well) I believe some arm toolchains has similar naming. Perhaps a generic xx$(CROSS) or $(CROSS)xx would be generally usable? /Johan ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
