In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 28 Jun 2002 16:10:26 +0100, Ben
Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
ben> Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
ben> > I've pondered starting to define some kind of general backward
ben> > compatibility flags. DEC C uses the macros DECC_V4_SOURCE and
ben> > DECC_V6_SOURCE to check if the user wants DEC C version 4 or version 6
ben> > compatibility. We could define the macros OPENSSL_096_SOURCE,
ben> > OPENSSL_097_SOURCE and so on.
ben>
ben> Hmm, that seems like a good idea. What would be even nicer (though
ben> perhaps less possible) is to make it so you can choose this per
ben> application (though it might need multiple builds of the library to
ben> support it).
That's extremely easy, just use some macros to choose the proper
function (which of course has something like the version coded in the
name).
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
