In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 03 Jul 2002 11:22:46 +0930, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Mark.Daniel> 1) These had E_OS.H in the [.SSL] directory as well as Mark.Daniel> the top-level package directory. 0.9.7 only has it in Mark.Daniel> the top-level. E_OS.H never existed in the [.SSL] as far as I know. Mark.Daniel> 2) Previously the SSL_LOCL.H file contained ... Mark.Daniel> Mark.Daniel> ****************************** Mark.Daniel> HT_ROOT:[SRC.OPENSSL-0_9_6D.SSL]SSL_LOCL.H;1 Mark.Daniel> Mark.Daniel> #include "openssl/e_os.h" Mark.Daniel> Mark.Daniel> Whereas now it contains ... Mark.Daniel> Mark.Daniel> ****************************** Mark.Daniel> HT_ROOT:[SRC.OPENSSL-0_9_7-BETA2.SSL]SSL_LOCL.H;1 Mark.Daniel> Mark.Daniel> #include "e_os.h" Mark.Daniel> Mark.Daniel> Will I need to change my build procedures? Shall I take it you don't use the build procedure that comes with OpenSSL? The explanation to the change is that e_os.h is no longer installed (per the install.com procedures). It never should have been, it's quite internal to OpenSSL. The build procedure in [.SSL] should have a /INCLUDE qualifier to CC with, among other perhaps, SYS$DISK:[-] as a value, and that should solve the problem. -- Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org/~levitte/ ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
