In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 11 Aug 2002 22:55:25 +0100, 
Bruce Stephens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

bruce> "OpenSSL Project" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
bruce> 
bruce> >   OpenSSL STATUS                           Last modified at
bruce> >   ______________                           $Date: 2002/08/08 22:55:28 $
bruce> >
bruce> >   DEVELOPMENT STATE
bruce> >
bruce> >     o  OpenSSL 0.9.8:  Under development...
bruce> >     o  OpenSSL 0.9.7-beta3: Released on July 30th, 2002
bruce> >     o  OpenSSL 0.9.7-beta2: Released on June 16th, 2002
bruce> >     o  OpenSSL 0.9.7-beta1: Released on June  1st, 2002
bruce> >     o  OpenSSL 0.9.6f: Released on August     8th, 2002
bruce> >     o  OpenSSL 0.9.6e: Released on July      30th, 2002
bruce> >     o  OpenSSL 0.9.6d: Released on May        9th, 2002
bruce> 
bruce> 0.9.6g was released on the 9th of August.  Why was that missed?

Very simple.  The STATUS posted comes from the main CVS trunk.
0.9.6{n} lives in a branch, and therefore has a different STATUS.
Unfortuntately, I forgot to update the STATUS in th emain trunk.  I've
done so now.

-- 
Richard Levitte   \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken  \ S-168 35  BROMMA  \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
                    \      SWEDEN       \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis                -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/

Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to