[jaenicke - Tue Aug 13 15:16:11 2002]:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 06:44:26PM +0200, Geoff Thorpe via RT wrote:
> > I think it's unlikely, but I'd guess off the top of my head that
> > something like the following would be less risky;
> >
> > if (a->sessions != NULL)
> > SSL_CTX_flush_sessions(a,0);
> >
> > CRYPTO_free_ex_data(ssl_ctx_meth,(char *)a,&a->ex_data);
> >
> > if (a->sessions != NULL)
> > lh_free(a->sessions);
>
> Makes sense to me. I consider this to be a bugfix, such that it might
> make its way into 0.9.6-stable and later.
Applied for 0.9.6 and later.
Lutz
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
