This patch is great news, since I'm also interested in anything that can reduce the size of my OpenSSL libraries
So please commit it.... Thanks, Kim Hellan -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Steven Reddie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sendt: 3. oktober 2002 14:50 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: RE: [openssl.org #287] [PATCH] no-engine (openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20020918) Is there any interest in this patch? I was under the impression that it would be commited if I did the work. Steven -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steven Reddie via RT Sent: Friday, 20 September 2002 5:25 PM Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [openssl.org #287] [PATCH] no-engine (openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20020918) Here is the patch for configuring-out the engine. This one should work; the previous one had a single misplaced #ifndef. I've tested it both with and without the no-engine option for the following platforms: Cygwin VC-WIN32 (dll and static) VC-CE (dll and static) Linux VC-CE is the Windows CE port that I'm working on and the reason that I need the no-engine option, although I imagine that I'll need it in my day job too when we upgrade. Is it possible to get this into a 0.9.7 snapshot soon? I'll need it before I can finalise the port. Regards, Steven ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
