Further testing of openssl-e-0.9.6-stable-SNAP-20021119: Linux 2.4.2-2: configures and builds fine, passes make test HP UX 11.0, 32 bit again: make test passes (other than bc test failing for lack of the right version of bc)
Apache 1.3.27, with mod_ssl 2.8.12 and mm-1.2.1, shmcb session cache, on both Linux 2.4.2-2 and HP UX 11.0: Apache runs with this snapshot, both with no cryptographic acceleration and with the CryptoSwift card, and the CryptoSwift card does offload and accelerate as expected. I think that's all the testing of 0.9.6h I'll have time to do before it's released, but it doesn't look as if it breaks anything on our platforms or with our card. Lynn Gazis Rainbow Technologies -----Original Message----- From: Lynn Gazis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 6:38 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: IMPORTANT: Please try the 0.9.6 snapshots openssl-e-0.9.6-stable-SNAP-20021119 tests: On HP UX 11.0, 32-bit, with compiler in /opt/ansic/bin: config: Pass, configured for hpux-parisc-cc make: Pass On AIX 4.3, with compiler gcc 3.0.4: config: Pass, configured for aix43-gcc make: Pass make test: Pass No time to test with Apache and mod_ssl on these platforms. Lynn Gazis Rainbow Technologies -----Original Message----- From: Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 10:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IMPORTANT: Please try the 0.9.6 snapshots Because of lack of time, and because I'm not entirely sure we've gotten all the reported bugs, I'm moving the release of 0.9.6h until thursday night (swedish time). Please test the snapshots for the 0.9.6 branch until then, on as many platforms as you have available and you feel you have the time for. Today, I'm going to release the 4th beta of the 0.9.7 branch. If all this seems confusing, please consider this: there are some places where considerable time has been taken to evaluate 0.9.6g and earlier 0.9.6 releases. The 0.9.6h release is mostly a bugfix release, which means that those who need to stick with the 0.9.6 series for a while can get all the fixes that have been reported while not having to do the enormous evaluation that some do. The 0.9.7 branch contains a large number of changes. It's also the version that's taken the longest for us to develop (more than two years after the release of 0.9.6!). It will probably take some time before it has the same level of acceptance as the 0.9.6 series, and for the places that do that, it probably means going through a full evaluation again. -- Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 \ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
