In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 4
Dec 2002 23:02:21 -0500 (EST), Rich Salz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rsalz> > author has explicitely asked for a default certificate, through something
rsalz> > like 'X509_LOOKUP_load_file(lookup,NULL,X509_FILETYPE_DEFAULT)'. Note
rsalz> > the last argument.
rsalz>
rsalz> Sure, but if they told you a filename and it contains garbage than I think
rsalz> it's an error. If they told you a filename and it doesn't exist, then
rsalz> I htink that's an error. If they don't give you a filename, then you're
rsalz> on your own to find a default.
If the file pointed at with SSL_CERT_FILE is faulty in any way, the
code will fall back to the built-in default. If that fails, an error
is generated. How much does that differ from what you said?
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
