Richard Levitte wrote: Hello Richard,
OpenSSL CVS Repository http://cvs.openssl.org/ ____________________________________________________________________________Server: cvs.openssl.org Name: Richard Levitte Root: /e/openssl/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Is that really a good idea ?
Module: openssl Date: 11-Dec-2002 07:59:18
Branch: HEAD Handle: 2002121106591600
Modified files:
openssl/crypto/des des.h des_old.h
Log:
Since HEADER_DES_H has been the protector of des.h since libdes
(before SSLeay, maybe?), it's better to have that macro protect
the compatibility header des_old.h. In the new des.h, let's use
a slightly different protecting macro.
[...]
Index: openssl/crypto/des/des.h
============================================================
$ cvs diff -u -r1.42 -r1.43 des.h
--- openssl/crypto/des/des.h 26 Mar 2002 14:28:04 -0000 1.42
+++ openssl/crypto/des/des.h 11 Dec 2002 06:59:16 -0000 1.43
@@ -56,8 +56,8 @@
* [including the GNU Public Licence.]
*/
-#ifndef HEADER_DES_H
-#define HEADER_DES_H
+#ifndef HEADER_NEW_DES_H
+#define HEADER_NEW_DES_H
[...] I think it would be better to use something like: #ifndef HEADER_OPENSSL_DES_H #define HEADER_OPENSSL_DES_H No other module could use this protector unintentionally... Bye Goetz -- Goetz Babin-Ebell, TC TrustCenter AG, http://www.trustcenter.de Sonninstr. 24-28, 20097 Hamburg, Germany Tel.: +49-(0)40 80 80 26 -0, Fax: +49-(0)40 80 80 26 -126
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
