At 12:22 PM 12/13/02 +0000, Bertie wrote:
>At 10:02 AM 12/13/02 +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
>>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 13
>Dec 2002 08:54:50 +0000, Bertie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>>bertie> Your changes aren't in the latest snapshot,
>>bertie> openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20021212.tar.gz. Is there some other
>>bertie> way that I can test them ?
>>
>>You can rsync our repository, and check out openssl with the branch
>>tag OpenSSL_0_9_7-stable.
>
>Have rsync'd the latest and eyeballed your changes. They look fine to me, I
>like the way you have left the error in if dynlocks not supported this is
>visible from e.g. openssl speed -engine chil -multi 2 rsa1024.
>
>Have not had time to test with apache2 but will ASAP.

Have got the head of branch OpenSSL_0_9_7-stable to work with a vanilla
httpd-2.0.43 configured using:
        CFLAGS="-DSSL_EXPERIMENTAL_ENGINE" ./configure --enable-ssl
--with-ssl=/usr/local/ssl --with-mpm=worker
and setting
        SSLCryptoDevice chil
The machine is happily handling 600 conns/sec with no lack of locking
asserts from chil which is good.
Bertie



______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to