In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 16 Dec 2002 20:53:20 +0100, Andy
Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
appro> > Eh god... So basically, we not only need to detect if GNU ld is used,
appro> > but that it's really GNU cc as well?
appro>
appro> Alternative could be to run /usr/ccs/bin/ld directly, but then we would
appro> have to cope with multiple ABI supported by kernel ourselves and we
appro> don't want that. I think...
Not a good idea, we'd also miss the links back to libc and so on...
appro> > What happens if the compiler
appro> > isn't GNU but ld is?
appro>
appro> Can't happen. Vendor compiler driver does not take any chances but
appro> invokes linker by explicit path, /usr/ccs/bin/ld to specific. Well, the
appro> only exclusion from this rule is when it wants/is instructed to perform
appro> incremental linking in which case it calls /opt/SUNWspro/*/bin/ild,
appro> where * stands for a version abbreviation, e.g. WS6 stands for WorkShop
appro> 6. A.
OK.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
