In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 27 Dec 2002 13:30:23 +0100, Andy
Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
appro> There are two more options.
appro>
appro> 3. Remove ${x86_elf_asm} from sco5-gcc line.
appro>
appro> 4. Replace ${x86_elf_asm} in sco5-gcc rule with ${x86_sol_asm} and that
appro> would be *it*. No, no extra filter should be required as it will be GNU
appro> cpp which will preprocess the .cpp file and no offending spaces will be
appro> injected. Yes, I'm contradicting to myself here, but this is not my
appro> vote, #3 is. For 0.9.7 that is.
Honestly, I personally don't care which is chosen. I think that if
it's possible to have it work (with the definition of "work" I gave
before) with assembler code, good. Otherwise, take it out for now,
and let's work on that for 0.9.7a or later.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
