> rt> uname -m return on your machine? But most of all I wonder do we really > rt> have to have separate lines for NetBSD, FreeBSD and OpenBSD? Why can't > rt> we unify those lines to asteriskBSD-platform? In which case sparc64 > rt> recognition becomes a must as other flavors do support non-UltraSPARCs. > > I'd be happy to unify them if you can guarantee they will never differ > in any way that's important to us...
"You" who? Me? I just wondered if it was possible as it does seem unnecessary to *me* from first sight. I know too little about those BSDs to guarantee anything. At least at this point... Well, even if I knew everything I probably wouldn't be able to quarantee anything anyway:-) What one can do is to introduce asteriskBSD-platform lines and challenge NetBSD, FreeBSD and OpenBSD developers to verify that './Configure asteriskBSD-`uname -m`' works and feels comfortable for them. A. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
