In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 10 Jan 2003 17:40:18 +0100, Andy
Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
appro> > And also, I have understood
appro> > that libssl.so does need a -R/-rpath to be able to find libcrypto.so,
appro> > on which it depends.
appro>
appro> This is not true. The fact that 'ldd libssl.so' says "can't locate
appro> libcrypto.so" does *not* mean that libssl.so is bound to fail to link
appro> with libcrypto.so. -L and -R options at *application* link time provide
appro> for that. -R/-rpath option at libssl.so link time can and should be
appro> omitted. -R/-rpath option at *application* link time is the one to be
appro> used.
Ah, so recursive loads inherit the -R/-rpath values? It's good to
know I misunderstood this.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
