Andy Polyakov via RT wrote:

>>+ "sx6", "cc:-g -DTERMIOS::(unknown):::SIXTY_FOUR_BIT DES_INT:::",
>>
> 
> No optimization? Not even lousy -O?


-g overrides any optimization you give, and i think there's a problem with
the optimizer anyway because with default optimization, aes-128-cbc test fails.
it's fine with -g.


> SIXTY_FOUR_BIT? SIXTY_FOUR_BIT aims ILP32 ABIs implemented on 64-bit
> CPUs, N32 ABI on IRIX 6 is one example. If your sizeof(long)==8, then
> you should use SIXTY_FOUR_BIT_LONG. Please confirm.


thank you for the note.  yes, it should be SIXTY_FOUR_BIT_LONG.

wendy




-- 
wendy palm
Cray OS Sustaining Engineering, Cray Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 651-605-9154

______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to