In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed,  1 Oct 2003 17:01:19 +0200 (METDST), "[EMAIL 
PROTECTED] via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

rt> That's an OK solution, but what are the feelings towards those
rt> commas? Are those left out on purpose or were they typos?

They were typos, and have already been corrected.

-- 
Richard Levitte   \ Tunnlandsvägen 3  \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  \ S-168 36  BROMMA  \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
                    \      SWEDEN       \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis                -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/

Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.

______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to