In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 5 Nov 2003 08:42:39 +0100 (MET), "Jeffrey
Altman via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rt>
rt> The inclusion of "e_os.h" in crypto\des\cfb_enc.c must be specified as
rt> either
rt>
rt> #include "openssl/e_os.h"
Absolutely not!
rt> or
rt>
rt> #include "../e_os.h"
I'd rather say either:
#ifdef FLAT_INC
# include "e_os.h"
#else
# include "../../e_os.h"
#endif
or:
#include "e_os.h"
I prefer the latter.
rt> This is not performed in a consistent manner in OpenSSL 0.9.6.
Uhmm, why does cbc_enc.c need e_os.h?
But you're right, the consistency is a bit lacking there...
-----
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsv�gen 3 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S-168 36 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
