in principle, seems so ...
BUT, i'm not at all sure why the 'lower' compatibility version number had been coded
in (i.e., w/ 'cut -d. -f1') in
the first place.
if nothing ELSE breaks, then it should be the right way/place to handle it, methinks.
cheers,
richard
-- On Friday, December 12, 2003 11:12 AM +0100 Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 12 Dec 2003 10:20:47 +0100 (MET),
> "OpenMacNews via RT"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> rt> the following changes seem to cure the problem ...
> rt>
> rt> (EDITOR) Makefile.org
> rt> @ 304
> rt> --- -compatibility_version ${SHLIB_MAJOR}.`echo ${SHLIB_MINOR} |
> cut -d. -f1` \
> rt> +++ -compatibility_version 0.9.7 \
>
> I assume, then, that having the following would be correct:
>
> -compatibility_version ${SHLIB_MAJOR}.${SHLIB_MINOR} \
>
> That would be very practical, since that's one less place where we
> need to remember to update the version number...
>
> -----
> Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
> See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
> You don't have to be rich, a $10 donation is appreciated!
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
