Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > on Tue, 23 Mar 2004 18:12:08 -0500, "Green, Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Paul.Green> I have ported OpenSSL 0.9.7c to the Stratus VOS operating > Paul.Green> system. Thanks for providing such a high-quality porting > Paul.Green> base; it made my job much easier. I am attaching the > Paul.Green> patches to this letter. > > I'm taking a first serious look at it. Sorry for the delays, there > were a number of things before this in my queue. No problem. > Paul.Green> I have verified the patches against version 0.9.7d, and > Paul.Green> this patch file is against that newer version. I also > Paul.Green> tested the patches on a Solaris system to ensure I didn't > Paul.Green> break anything. > > Windows? That seems to be a culprit more often than not. Unfortunately, I do not have a Windows development environment. I'll look into acquiring one before I submit any future patches. > As far as I can tell, all the changes are acceptable, at least for > 0.9.8-dev (I need to do further checks before accepting it into the > 0.9.7 branch), except for the following: > > Paul.Green> 3. apps/Makefile.ssl. > Paul.Green> > Paul.Green> I applied the executable suffix in all applicable rules. > Paul.Green> I commented out the running of the openssl command, > Paul.Green> because (a) it doesn't work in a cross-development > Paul.Green> environment and (b) the top-level "test" rule runs it > Paul.Green> anyway; this reference is redundant, as far as I can tell. > Paul.Green> (I think that the makefiles should put a chinese wall > Paul.Green> between building and testing, so that cross-platform > Paul.Green> builds never try to execute any files). > > While I understand the cross-compile argument, the certificate > rehashing isn't just there for "make test", it's there for anyone who > wants to try out any certificate-checking openssl command. Therefore, > it is part of the build itself. > > At the same, it's really silly to have exactly the same rehash done in > Makefile.org and in apps/Makefile.ssl, thanks for making us aware of > that... Thanks for taking the time to look at my proposed changes. Clearly, not many people have attempted to build OpenSSL in a cross-development environment (or at least, not many people have submitted patches in this area). I think that some of these things are a matter of taste, and I respect your judgement. My only suggestion would be to consider having distinct makefile rules for some of these sub-cases, so that (say) those of us who want to cross-build could type "make cross-all" and not invoke any rule that executes any code. Again, thank you for your efforts on behalf of OpenSSL. It's a great product. Thanks PG -- Paul Green, Senior Technical Consultant Stratus Technologies, Inc. 111 Powdermill Rd, Maynard, MA 01754 Tel +1-978-461-7557, Fax +1-978-461-3610 ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
