Hi,

For me it is OK now since the latest HPUX patches were applied last
year.

Best wishes,
        Frode 


        Frode Weierud           Phone  : +41 22 7674794
        CERN, SL,               Fax    : +41 22 7679185
        CH-1211 Geneva 23,      E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        Switzerland                      [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
                                WWW    : http://home.cern.ch/frode/

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard
Levitte via RT
Sent: Thursday, 06 May, 2004 21:16
To: Frode Weierud
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [openssl.org #623] Problem make clean 


Guys,

this ticket was last commented on almost a year ago.  Is it still an
issue?

[jaenicke - Wed May 28 23:02:27 2003]:

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun May 25 09:42:02 2003]: 
>  
> > On Fri, 23 May 2003, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote: 
> >  
> > > > 
> > > > I think my machine has a decent set of patches but as I don't
> have root
> > > > access I cannot really verify that. Do you think you can do 
> > > > getconf ARG_MAX and getconf LINE_MAX on your machine such that I
> can see
> > > > if this is indeed the problem? 
> > > 
> > > serv01 24: getconf ARG_MAX
> > > 20478
> > > serv01 26: getconf LINE_MAX
> > > 2048
> > > 
> > > Best regards, 
> > >   Lutz
> >  
> > Hi Lutz,
> >  
> > I think this must mean there is something wrong with my workstation
> or my
> > setup. I have exactly the same values as you so this cannot be the 
> > limiting factor. Perhaps there is a patch which is missing.
>  
> Hmm. I have no more specific ideas. I did dig out the following: 
>  
> PHKL_10176: 
>       The internal buffer within the kernel was created with a 
>       length of 20480 bytes, with no provision for increasing its 
>       size.  This patch provides for up to 100 such buffers, with 
>       all but the first allocated only if required (that is, if 
>       more than 20480 bytes of argv/env information is found). 
>       Thus, exec() now supports up to 2048000 bytes of argv/env 
>       information. 
>  
> However: this patch has long been superseeded by PHKL_16750 (and other

> later versions of this patch)...
>  
> Best regards, 
>       Lutz
>  
>  

--
Richard Levitte
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to