Just a comment on what I just wrote...

[levitte - Mon Jun 28 13:37:50 2004]:

> I've looked back at the ERR_free_state_table() discussion, and I can't 
> find any message where we came to a resolution.  Looking at the patch 
> right now, I still fail to see what that function does that 
> ERR_remove_state() doesn't.  It should be noted that 
ERR_remove_state() 
> *does* remove the whole table when there are no more references to it. 
 
> The way it's supposed to work is that it should be called at the end 
of 
> each thread (including the main one).  My stand on this issue hasn't 
> changed since we discussed it last.

If ERR_remove_state() doesn't work as it should (as said above), then 
it's a bug in ERR_remove_state() and should be treated that way, and 
therefore result in a fix of ERR_remove_state().  IMHO.

-- 
Richard Levitte
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to