Just couple of common words first. I realize that sometimes we can't match the level of enthusiasm of our contributors [which might be experienced as frustrating], but I want to emphasize that it does *not* mean that the feedback is not appreciated. Please, keep up the good work and bear with us. It *is* appreciated.
Thanks. I don't expect many folks to get excited over porting a program to DOS.
Next thing to understand. Changes to 0.9.7 are *currently* prioritized, because we're trying to schedule 0.9.7f release. For this reason we [or at least I] a bit reluctant to apply cosmetic changes to 0.9.7. Or in other words changes that solve *real* problems in 0.9.7 are prioritized for *this* particular moment. So don't get upset if you find that not everything went in, or you have to argue and show that the problem is *real*, or 0.9.8 changes were left without immediate attention.
Just to make sure others get their "thank you." The above two comments of mine essentially address *all* contributors, not Doug personally. In other words the comments are not actually DJGPP specific, we value *all* feedback even if we don't explicitly show it. Cheers. A.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [email protected]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
