> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andy Polyakov > Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 2:37 AM > To: openssl-dev@openssl.org > Subject: Re: Minimum compiler support on different unix flavours? > > > >>As part of a project I am compiling OpenSSL on multiple > different Unix > >>flavours and have had many different problems when trying to > >>get OpenSSL > >>to compile. > >> > > Let be give you just a bit of advice. OpenSSL is > extremely sensitive > > to half-assed gcc installations. > > Why just OpenSSL? *Any* application or toolkit might fall victim to > "half-assed gcc installation."
Sorry, I was not meaning to single out OpenSSL. Rather that any complex application is more likely to be affected just because with more lines of code the chance for trouble with it rises. > > > One thing though that the FAQ is missing is a good general discussion > > of randomness. I'll try to write one here, perhaps Andy would see > > fit to include it? > > By addressing me personally you effectively discourage other members > from picking up the matter. Not intended at all, I'll keep that in mind for the future. Ted ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
