On May 26, 2005 03:06 am, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > geoff> Richard, any idea of how safe it would be to change the names > geoff> of the two shared librariesy at this stage of the 0.9.8 betas? > geoff> I'm reluctant to charge ahead for fear of breaking the strange > geoff> builds (win32, VMS, cygwin, ...) > > (I'll join Corinna in saying "What? VMS a strange build? How dare > you... ;-)")
Eek, I've incurred the wrath of the Cult Of Strange Platforms In Denial ... :-) > I have no problems with a name change of the sort. In the VMS case, I > doubt anyone will mind :-). Actually, even in the "unstrange" build, this would be more intrusive than I anticipated - it would require renaming the C files too (ie. the makefile maps 'ncipher' to 'libncipher.so' and 'e_ncipher.c'). Thoughts? [snip] > geoff> duplicate symbol in libcrypto and so "make install" ended up [snip] > Does that happen with a clean working directory? Oops, good call :-) Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/ Greedy Genghis George, Guru of God and Guns. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
