Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
Quite honestly, even though I'm quite an enthusiastic OpenSSL developer for years and have been for years (since it started, really), I can't really recommend OpenSSL as an LSB candidate from that point of view, as it stands today. Every "major upgrade" (which we define as a change of x in 0.9.x) has had some kind of incompatibility with previous versions.
http://www.gnu.org/software/gnutls/ exposes two APIs: the OpenSSL api (I gather?), and its own. Has anyone looked at gnutls's api to see if it exposes fewer structures? If so, perhaps that might provide a way forward: apps that need a stable interface can use the gnutls api (which openssl could provide as a wrapper); everyone else could use the openssl api (which gnutls seems to provide as a wrapper, unless I misread the docs). - Dan -- Trying to get a job as a c++ developer? See http://kegel.com/academy/getting-hired.html ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
